An Analysis of Coherence of Chinese Courtroom Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2014.03.28Keywords:
Coherence, Chinese courtroom discourse, Meaning, Civil trial, Criminal trial.Abstract
Coherence, the relationships which link the meanings of utterances in a discourse or of the sentences in a text, is realized on two levels: linear or sequential coherence and global semantic structure. Taking the audio recording transcripts of two trials (one criminal and one civil) as data, this paper analyzes coherence of Chinese courtroom discourse. The findings indicate that courtroom discourse is coherent semantically (there are meaning relations between different parts of the discourse), topically (different parts of the discourse accord with its general topic), contextually (different parts of the discourse mix with the context and accomplish the communication together), and historically (the discourse refers back to its history, i.e. preceding trials, etc).
References
Brown, G. and Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226
Danes, F. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In R Danes, ed. Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, Prague: Academia /The Hague: Mouton; 106-128.
Eades, D. 2010. Sociolinguistics and the Legal Process. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge/Oxford: Polity Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hu, D. H. 2010. “Cohesion of Legal Text and C-E Translation: A Case Study of Companies Law of the People’s Republic of China.” Journal of Mudanjiang College of Education, 123(5): 58-60.
Huang, L.F. 2008. Cohesive ties in legal text. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation of Southwest University of Political Science, China.
Liao, M. Z. 2003. A Study on Courtroom Questions, Responses and Their Interaction: A Linguistic Perspective. Beijing: Law Press.
Liao, M. Z. 2012. Frame analysis of courtroom discourse. Contemporary Rhetoric 4: 83-91.
Lv, 2011, A Study of Power in Chinese Courtroom Discourse. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. 1988. “Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization.” Text, 8(3): 243-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243
Sanders, T., Spooren, W. and Noordman, L. 1992. “Towards a taxonomy of coherence relations. ” Discourse Processes. 15: 1-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544800
Sanders, T., Spooren, W. and Noordman, L. 1993. “Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representations.” Cognitive Linguistics 4: 93-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.2.93
Shi, G. 2014. “Intertextuality in Chinese courtroom discourse: a critical perspective.” Chinese Semiotic Studies 10 (3): 427-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/css-2014-0035
Tao, Y. 2009. “Theory of macro-structures and its application.” Journal of Dalian Maritime University (Social Sciences Edition) 8(5): 100-102.
van Dijk, T. A. 1977. Text and Context. London: Longman.
van Dijk, T. A. 1980. Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Studies of Global Structures in Discourse Interaction, and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wang, L. B. 2009. “Application of macrostructure theory in discourse analysis.” Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education 28 (11): 124-125.
Widdowson H G. 1978. Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Xiong, T. 2002. Cohesion in the Chinese legislative text. Unpublished Master Thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China.
Yang, X. H. and Jiang, X. L. 2014. “Coherence and incoherence of Chinese legislative text.” Foreign Language Education 35(3): 36-39.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Guang Shi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
